Mary Cummins Animal Advocates Los Angeles California Wildlife Rehabilitation Real Estate

Mary Cummins Animal Advocates Los Angeles California Wildlife Rehabilitation Real Estate
WEBSITE       FACEBOOK       YOUTUBE        MARY CUMMINS RESUME
Showing posts with label movie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movie. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Alleged animal cruelty in production of "A Dog's Purpose" movie coming out soon - Animal Advocates

A Dog's Purpose, animal cruelty, dog, water, Birds and Animals Unlimited, Ray Beal, Raymond Beal, Canada, Animal Advocates
UPDATE: 02/03/2017 AHA just released the results of their investigation into themselves. They cleared themselves of all wrong doing, imagine that. Here is their report http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/nr-report_Redacted-2.pdf

As an employee for AHA we were told that the animals cannot be stressed or frightened. That is "abuse." The dog didn't die but it was still frightened. That is not allowed on set per AHA's own regulations.

AHA investigated themselves in the tragic deaths of horses in the movie "My Friend Flicka." They said the deaths were "unavoidable accidents." That's not what the Los Angeles Department of Animal Services said after their very thorough investigation. They said the deaths were avoidable. No horse should be allowed to run with a dangling lead. That's common sense. You wouldn't let a little kid run with long shoe laces untied. Here is the official report from the City. http://www.animaladvocates.us/Flicka_Incident.pdf    Here is the result of AHA's investigation into themselves. http://www.eonline.com/news/49785/report-accidents-fell-flicka-friends  I worked for AHA during this time though I wasn't on the Flicka set. One of the AHA horse experts said it was the inspector's fault. An immediate result was adding to the inspection manual that no horse should be allowed to run free with a long dangling lead.

01/23/2017 I thought Gavin's name sound familiar. We went to Beverly Hills High School together.

Gavin Polone producer of "A Dog's Purpose" just gave a statement about the incident and the American Humane Association (AHA). He stated "American Humane Association (AHA) is not an adequate protector of animals on set. They are not independent from the studios. They don't take a stand against abuse. They should have stopped this."

http://tmzvod-a.akamaihd.net/tmz/2017-01/23/0_rqf3japn_0_dibiz8d9.mp4

PETA has released a protest flyer.

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/dogs-purpose-peta-flier.pdf

The animal trainers have released this statement. This doesn't change anything. The dog was frightened. Everyone admits that. This is considered "harm." They admit the dog got sucked under the water. That would have also been frightening for the dog. They pulled the dog out. He did not drown or have any permanent harm. Still, he was frightened. Per AHA you cannot allow the animals to be frightened to shoot a scene. We still don't know who was holding the dog and trying to force him in the pool. It had to have been someone with Birds and Animals Unlimited. It doesn't look like Beals or the other listed animal trainer.

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0123_a_dogs_purpose_statement.pdf

This is from Gavin from the Hollywood Reporter.

"Last Thursday, I went to Amblin's office and watched all the film shot on the day in question, as well as saw video from the trainers and still photographs. As with the TMZ video that you saw, two things were evident: 1) the dog handler tries to force the dog, for 35 to 40 seconds, into the water when, clearly, he didn’t want to go in; and 2) in a separate take filmed sometime later, the dog did go into the water, on his own, and, at the end, his head is submerged for about 4 seconds. These two things are absolutely INEXCUSABLE and should NEVER have happened. The dog trainer should have stopped trying to get the dog to go in the water as soon as the dog seemed uncomfortable, and the trainers should have had support under the dog as soon as he came to the side of the pool and/or had less turbulence in the water so he never would have gone under. The American Humane Association (AHA) representative who is paid by the production to “ensure the safety and humane treatment of animal actors,” as its website states, should have also intervened immediately on both of those parts of the filming. So should have whomever was running the set. Those individuals should be held accountable and never used again by that studio or its affiliates.

I also hold myself accountable because, even though I was not present, I knew and had written about how ineffective AHA has been over the years. Its monitors have been present when bad things have happened to animals on sets, not offering enough protection to stop those events and displaying no real protest after they occurred. Though AHA is the standard guarantor of animal safety on all studio productions and I was not consulted when they nor the dog trainers were hired, I should have fought with the studio to come up with alternatives to serve those functions. I didn’t, and there is nothing to mitigate my inaction. I’m deeply sorry about that."

Full link

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/gavin-polone-a-dogs-purpose-outcry-what-happened-whos-blame-967160

01/21/2017 The producer has supposedly seen the "original full video." That is impossible because that was someone's personal cellphone video. The producer could have only seen the professional video the cameraman shot from a different angle. Of course the cameraman is not going to be shooting when the animal is just getting used to the water. Cameraman would only film when they were ready to shoot it for the film.

The producer said that the dog was in the water earlier that day and was fine. They just wanted to shoot it from the other side. Dog was not trained to jump in the water on the other side. Dog got scared.

That story makes no sense. The trainer was trying to dip the dog in the water so he would realize the water is warm. That is on the audio on the video. If the dog had indeed been in the water earlier, he would have already known it was warm.  Dog also would have been wet and not dry.

Producer went on to say the dog was not physically harmed or killed. We realize that. Still, the dog was frightened. When I worked for AHA we had to make sure the animals were not frightened. They said dog chasing cats can't be induced by fear. They must train the animals to follow the other and make it appear to be chased. That dog was clearly frightened. Everyone admitted that. That is against AHA regulations. The dog doesn't have to die for it to be a violation of AHA regs or cruelty.

I think that was first time dog was getting into the water with the jets on. Why not put him in the water with the jets off then slowly turn them on so he can get used to it? If you look at the final cut, the dog jumps off a wooden ledge. There's no water in the pic. The next frame is from another angle with the dog going into the water. The dog did not jump into the water on the final film. I haven't seen the full movie, only the trailer.

The producer now asks the question "why didn't they take the video to the media 15 months ago when it was filmed? Why did they wait for the press junket?" The answer is clear. The dog was not injured or in danger of dying. There would be no reason to make it public instantly. PETA or whomever released the tape to TMZ a week before the opening of the film and press junket. The reason was to get full media attention on the issue. FTR I don't support everything PETA does. I'm against circus and zoo animals. I support sanctuaries. I think there can be some safe and humane exhibit of animals for education or positive media. This movie could have been that positive media. There was no reason to scare the dog like that.

They also should have tested the jets to see if the dog could get sucked under like he was. If you angle jets against a corner, it will cause animals, people to get sucked under. There's a place on some famous rapids where if you don't go straight through the middle, you will get sucked under and sucked to the bottom of the river. They can't even get the dead body out because the force of the swirling water keeps the body pressed to the rocks.

http://ew.com/movies/2017/01/20/dogs-purpose-author-additional-footage-paints-different-picture/

Here are the AHA guidelines.

"If any animal appears aggressive, stressed and/or charges, threatens or bites any
person or animal, it shall be removed immediately from the set and location."

https://www.americanhumane.org/app/uploads/2016/08/Guidelines2015-WEB-Revised-110315-1.pdf

01/19/2017 "There will be no premiere for "A Dog's Purpose" because the studio that produced it is still reeling from the video posted showing it's animal star in distress.

Amblin and Universal studios are still reviewing footage that syncs up with the video TMZ posted to determine what happened to Hercules when he clearly was recoiling as his trainer tried pulling him into the water. The studios say the dog is fine and was never abused.

The studios know lots of people are upset after seeing the video. The studios have also canceled the press junkets."

This is sad all the way around. I know the main producer, actors love animals and would never want to see them harmed. They hoped the movie would want to make people adopt pets from shelters which is why they teamed up with Best Friends. I hoped the same. I personally feel what happened with the dog on the second production team was the result of underlings just trying to get the shot no matter what. I don't know who is the guy holding the dog and trying to get him in the water. I don't think it's Bean because he looks different. It's also not the other animal trainer who looks different. No other animal trainers are credited in the film. Did they let anyone try to force the dog in the pool? If AHA was there, what went wrong? I was trained by them, worked for them for one day so I know that they don't really care about animals. Still, what went wrong here.

_________________

I will predict that nothing happens to the people involved.

"A Dog's Purpose" crew members are now under investigation by Canada's Chief Veterinary Office, and jail time is on the table if the agency finds any wrongdoing.
The CVO tells TMZ it received a formal complaint on Wednesday, and has begun looking into what went down on the set during filming in Winnipeg.
TMZ posted the video of Hercules, a German Shepherd, appearing terrified to get in churning water to shoot a scene for the movie. The trainer tried for about 40 seconds to put Hercules in the pool. The CVO says it wasn't involved with the filming, because a rep from the American Humane Association was on set. That rep, we've learned, has since been suspended.
The Office could levy a fine up to $10k and/or sentence offenders to up to 6 months in jail."

PETA confirmed that all the animals in the film came from Birds and Animals Unlimited in Acton, California. That is the website and Facebook page that has been shut down all day.

"The animal-rights group is targeting a specific animal supplier — Acton, CA-based Birds & Animals Unlimited.

According to PETA, a manager at BAU told its undercover investigator that they provided all the dogs for the film and Deadline confirmed this evening that BAU handled the dog in the video."

The producer stated this,

“I’m horrified by this,” said Polone. “The first thing I asked was, ‘Is the dog OK?’ He’s fine. But if I had seen that, I would have stopped it in a minute. People have to be held responsible for this. It was someone’s job to watch out for this kind of thing. Why didn’t they? This is something I’ve written about before, whether it be circus animals or animals on set. American Humane are supposed to be there supervising. That’s their job that someone is paid a lot of money to do. Why wasn’t this stopped? There needs to be a better system than this. That’s what I’ve called for in the past. I agree with PETA that they not only need to make sure animals are treated properly on set, but they also need to find out where the animals are kept outside of the set. To make sure they are treated properly at all times.”

"Animal Justice says it has filed complaints with the Winnipeg Humane Society, the Chief Veterinary Office of Manitoba, and the Winnipeg police department alleging violations of federal and provincial animal protection laws.

“Throwing a terrified German Shepherd into rushing water is blatant animal cruelty,” Camille Labchuk, a lawyer and executive director of Animal Justice, said in a news release.

“It is illegal to inflict suffering and anxiety onto animals, and there is no loophole that lets Hollywood moviemakers get away with abusing animals on a film set."

"Actor Josh Gad, who lends his voice to a dog in the film, issued a statement on Twitter saying he has asked the studio and production team for an explanation of what he calls "disturbing images."

He said that while the finished film is "one of the most beautiful love letters to animals I have ever seen," he was troubled by the video.

"I am shaken and sad to see any animal put in a situation against its will," Gad wrote. A publicist for the actor confirmed the post was authentic."

The scene is included in the movie. You can't use film where someone, an animal was harmed. That's law so people won't make snuff films or intentionally do a dangerous stunt. Below are a few frames from the trailers.

A Dog's Purpose, animal cruelty, dog, water, Birds and Animals Unlimited, Ray Beal, Raymond Beal, Canada, Animal Advocates

A Dog's Purpose, animal cruelty, dog, water, Birds and Animals Unlimited, Ray Beal, Raymond Beal, Canada, Animal Advocates
A Dog's Purpose, animal cruelty, dog, water, Birds and Animals Unlimited, Ray Beal, Raymond Beal, Canada, Animal Advocates

A Dog's Purpose, animal cruelty, dog, water, Birds and Animals Unlimited, Ray Beal, Raymond Beal, Canada, Animal Advocates
A Dog's Purpose, animal cruelty, dog, water, Birds and Animals Unlimited, Ray Beal, Raymond Beal, Canada, Animal Advocates
A Dog's Purpose, animal cruelty, dog, water, Birds and Animals Unlimited, Ray Beal, Raymond Beal, Canada, Animal Advocates

The producers just said that the dog "Hercules" was not forced to perform and he's fine. They stated the film "A DOG'S PURPOSE, produced by Amblin Entertainment and distributed by Universal Pictures, is a celebration of the special connection between humans and their dogs. And in the spirit of this relationship, the Amblin production team followed rigorous protocols to foster an ethical and safe environment for the animals.

While we continue to review the circumstances shown in the edited footage, Amblin is confident that great care and concern was shown for the German Shepherd Hercules, as well as for all of the other dogs featured throughout the production of the film. There were several days of rehearsal of the water scenes to ensure Hercules was comfortable with all of the stunts. On the day of the shoot, Hercules did not want to perform the stunt portrayed on the tape so the Amblin production team did not proceed with filming that shot.

Hercules is happy and healthy."

Sounds like bullshit to me.

Story gets worse! American Humane Association was on set monitoring the animal. The inspector said and did nothing! I was trained by AHA and worked for them for a day. They side with the filmmaker over the animals.

"The representative from the American Humane Association who was on the set of "A Dog's Purpose" has been suspended after officials saw video of a terrorized dog on set."

Disturbing video below showing an animal trainer forcing his dog into turbulent water who then goes under was posted on TMZ earlier today. The scene was part of the movie "A Dog's Purpose" which is coming out January 27, 2017.



The animal trainers listed for the film are Raymond Beal of Birds and Animals Unlimited and Brian Turi of Studio Animals. The film "A Dog's Purpose" partners with VCA and Best Friends. We sent a polite email asking about the footage to ir@vca.com ericr@bestfriends.org studioanimals@gmail.com California@birdsandanimals.com. We will post their reply when they reply. The man in the video does not look like Brian Turi. It looks like Ray Beal a little. He works with that type of dog. Here's a pic of him. I am not 100% positive that Ray is the person in the video. The person in the video appears to be balding and has red hair. Maybe it is the water safety person? I've asked all involved who it was but no response. Nonetheless the trainer and AHA person should have been watching out for the dog and not allowed that shot.

Ray Beal, Raymond Beal animal trainer "A Dog's Purpose" Birds and Animals Unlimited, california, cruelty, movie
This is from a behind the scenes of the movie. This is one of the handlers. It looks like Ray Beal. I wonder if the guy is the AHA person. We had to wear our shirts and hat on set. I worked for them for one day though went through a week of training.



Mary Cummins
of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

American Humane Association guilty for dead horse in Flicka movie


American Humane Association guilty for dead horse in Flicka movie

Flicka, American Humane Association, Tim McGraw

Here is the letter from the Department of Animal Services Los Angeles about the investigation into the dead horse on the set of the movie "Flicka." Link to actual pdf below. The City determined that the death was preventable. They let the horse run with a long dangling lead. He stepped on it, his neck went down and he died. Everyone knows you NEVER let a horse run around with a dangling lead that they could step on. American Humane Association is responsible for allowing the horse to run with a dangling lead.

City of Los Angeles 
CALIFORNIA 
ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA   
MAYOR 
DEPARTMENT OF 
ANIMAL SERVICES 
221 North Figueroa Street 
5th Floor 
Los Angeles, CA 90012 
(888) 452-7381 
FAX (213) 482-9511 
______ 

EDWARD A. BOKS 
GENERAL MANAGER 


October 17, 2006



Karen Rosa
Director
American Humane Film & TV Unit
15366 Dickens Street
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

Dear Ms. Rosa:

I am responding to your inquiry into Animal Services’ investigation into the Flicka
Incident.  This incident involved the death of a horse with a painted number 23 on its
hindquarters.  The horse was running with another horse inside the Hansen Dam Arena
at the time of death.

A special task force investigated the following allegations that arose following this death:
1) the horses involved were from the Bureau of Land Management; 2) the horses did
not have halters and lead ropes on; 3) cattle prods or other devices were used to incite
the horses to act wild; 4) the horses were abused; and 5) the cause of death was the
result of abuse.

Animal Services’ findings to these allegations are as follows:

1. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (B.L.M.) HORSES USED ON THE “FLICKA”
MOVIE SET:  After extensive interviews it was confirmed that the horses were
professional bucking horses provided by Bill Agin and were not from the Bureau of
Land Management.

2. THE ABSENCE OF HALTERS AND LEAD ROPES ON THE HORSES:  Halters and
lead ropes were used in the “Wild Horse” race scenes.  All of the horses had halters
and lead ropes on them during the filming of the “Wild Horse” race scenes.

3. CATTLE PRODS OR OTHER DEVICES WERE USED TO INCITE THE HORSES TO ACT
WILD:  There is no evidence that any cattle prod or any other electrical devices were
used on any of the horses at any time.   The “Wild Horse” race footage was
observed and there was no evidence of any cattle prods, hot shots, handheld
shockers or whips used on any of the horses. The film footage was observed from 5
different POV’s (Point of View) and included footage before and after each take.
Witnesses directly on top of the chutes during the filming also stated that they did
not observe any of the handler’s using any type of electrical device or whip to agitate
the horses.

4. THE HORSES WERE ABUSED:  There is no evidence that the horses were abused
at any time.  The film footage showed the activity before and after each take and at
no time is there any evidence that the horses were hit or abused.  The photos and
necropsy of the deceased horse showed it to be in excellent shape and weight with
no apparent signs of being overworked.

5. THE CAUSE OF DEATH WAS THE RESULT OF ABUSE:  The necropsy report
concluded the horse died from tripping on its lead rope causing it to fall and break its
neck, which caused asphyxia due to diaphragmatic paralysis.  The report
characterized the cause of death as accidental.

After hundreds of hours of investigation Animal Services has determined that this was a
preventable accident.  Animal Services contends this accident could have been avoided
had the horses not been allowed to gallop or cantor freely with a dragging lead line and
without an outrider to control them.    

The “Wild Horse” race film footage showed a horse with a painted number 23 on its
hindquarters running with another horse inside the Hansen Dam Arena.  The horse
apparently tripped on its lead rope causing it to fall violently headfirst.  Once on the
ground the horse kicked its hind legs out for approximately three seconds then lay
motionless having died instantly.  Horse number 23 was not being chased by anyone
and both horses were alone at one end of the arena when the incident occurred.

The conclusion of this investigation is that the death of the horse, number 23, on the
“Flicka Wild Horse” race scene was a preventable accident but there was no violation of
the California Penal Code 597(a) or 597(b) or Los Angeles Municipal Code 53.65.
It is the responsibility of LA Animal Services to inspect and investigate the use or work
of animals in theatrical, motion picture, television and other performances and
productions and enforce the City of Los Angeles’ humane laws.  In the future Animal
Services should be contacted in advance time to fully monitor such filming and should
be provided unlimited access afterwards to conduct thorough investigations when
required.

Sincerely,




Edward A. Boks
General Manager
LA Animal Services

Cc: Tarriq Khero, LA Animal Services, President Commissioner
       Jim Bickhart, LA City of Los Angeles, Mayor’s Office
       Dov Lesel, LA City of Los Angeles, Deputy City Attorney
       David Diliberto, LA Animal Services, Field Ops Director

Flicka Incident
Page Two

Link to actual document obtained in a FOIA request.
http://www.animaladvocates.us/Flicka_Incident.pdf

BOARD OF 
ANIMAL SERVICES 
COMMISSIONERS 
______  
TARIQ A. KHERO 
PRESIDENT 
KATHLEEN RIORDAN 
VICE PRESIDENT 
MARIE ATAKE 
GLENN S. BROWN 
DEBORAH ANN KNAAN 


The movie is "Flicka." 

"Flicka is a 2006 movie adapted from the 1941 children's novel My Friend Flicka by Mary O'Hara. The film is directed by Michael Mayer. A previous adaptation, directed by Harold D. Schuster, was released in 1943.
This time, the plot focuses on a female protagonist, played by Alison Lohman. In previous versions, the main character was a male. The movie also features Maria BelloRyan Kwanten and Tim McGraw, who also served as executive producer of the soundtrack album.
Two horses died during the production of this movie. The death of the first horse occurred at Big Sky Ranch in Simi Valley, California. E Online has reported, "According to the AHA's [American Humane Association's] report, a horse broke its leg 'after a misstep' and suffered a 'very rare' injury requiring the animal to be euthanized." The second horse died two weeks later on April 25 during filming.[4]
After investigation, the American Humane Association declared that the deaths were not the fault of the filmmakers. However, the usual "No animals were harmed in the making of this film" statement would no longer appear in the end credits of the film.[4] "

In AHA's website they state the LAAS Flicka Incident report stated the death was an "unavoidable accident." "The City of Los Angeles Department of Animal Services (LA Animal Services) conducted its own investigation into the incident at Hansen Dam and concurred with American Humane Association's findings." Obviously AHA is lying about this as you can see from the official report.

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.



Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit

Back story of the Paw Project which took over a decade to make - Mary Cummins

Back story of "The Paw Project" which took over a decade to make - Mary Cummins, Animal Advocates

The Paw Project documentary took well over a decade to make. There were many challenges and hurdles through this long journey. Not only did the Veterinary Associations spend millions fighting us but so did a few individuals. The main person fighting against us was Dave Weisman of the Dax Foundation. Dave Weisman also hired a lobbyist to fight us. That paid lobbyist was none other than Ed Boks, Edward Boks who was then recently fired as the General Manager of Los Angeles Animal Services.

What is even more irksome is that both of these men supported Dr Jennifer Conrad and The Paw Project before they turned against us. They were both absolutely and completely against declawing cats. They'd even both spoken publicly against declawing cats.

Why did these men turn on us? Plain and simple Dave Weisman did it out of spite. Ed Boks did it for the money. These two men and their lobbying are the reason why Malibu City Council did not vote to make declawing cats illegal. We were successful in every other city from Beverly Hills to Culver City to San Francisco.

Eventually Dave Weisman knew that he was losing. He finally gave up on his vicious personal war when he spoke at Beverly Hills City Council. Finally he stopped fighting us. Ed Boks on the other hand left his "anonymous" pro-declaw website advocatesforfacts.org ( http://web.archive.org/web/20110807041136/http://advocatesforfacts.org ) on the Internet until his domain expired. These are two truly heartless, vicious men who are most definitely not animal lovers.

Notice Ed Boks states "Advocates for Fact-based Policy Making (AFPS) is a group of animal advocates, scientists and other animal loving people interested in developing humane programs and laws based on facts and scientific data that can produce measurable results."

AFPS does not exist. It is only Ed Boks, Edward Boks. The address is a p.o. box. Ed Boks commits fraud. He previously committed forgery by forging an LA City press release.

The video below is Dave Weisman of the Dax Foundation speaking FOR declawing cats October 27, 2009. He thought he would just speak and leave. He did not know that the Council Members were prepared with research and questions. He is ultimately shown to be a fraud. For those that don't know, "Dax" is actually Dave Weisman.





I just found a copy of a press release Dave Weisman of the Dax Foundation sent out June 17, 2008 asking politicians to vote against a bill which would ban city bans. Below is the text.

">> Newsroom >> News Releases >> Dax Foundation Urges Lawmakers to Reject Bill

Dax Foundation Urges Lawmakers to Reject Bill

Dax Foundation urges lawmakers to reject bill that would eliminate all local and municipal regulation of medical, veterinary, and a wide array of other businesses and professionals & give control to the state.
Please note that most of the sources and data used to support the statements made herein related to the deleterious medical and behavioral effects of declawing have proven to be unreliable. The Dax Foundation is completing a thorough review of all available data and the status of declawing restrictions, if any around the world. Once the data has been compiled the program materials will be updated.

LOS ANGELES – June 17, 2008

Dear Foundation Supporters,

Every day I receive a handful of requests from really motivated, passionate individuals who seek the assistance of the Dax Foundation to help them advance their cause of making the world a better place for people and animals. We do our best to quickly analyze these proposals and get involved when we believe that the team has the ability to realize its vision and that their program will make a meaningful difference to many.

The Dax Foundation has no political agenda whatsoever. We do not endorse candidates nor do we take positions on either side of the fence…we simply believe in the power and the preciousness of the individual. A few days ago we were approached by a passionate woman who alerted us to a little bill that has been sailing through the California State Assembly and asked for our help. It is known as AB 2427.

The bill states the following:

The people of the State of California do enact as follows: Section 460 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

No city or county shall prohibit a person or group of persons, authorized by one of the agencies in the Department of Consumer Affairs by a license, certificate, or other such means to engage in a particular business, from engaging in that business, occupation, or profession or any portion thereof, or from engaging in any act or series of acts that fall within the statutory or regulatory definition of that business, occupation, or profession. Nothing in this section shall prohibit any city or county or city and county from levying a business license tax solely for revenue purposes nor any city or county from levying a license tax solely for the purpose of covering the cost of regulation.

Prima fasciae this seems like a reasonable rule…until one ponders its incredibly far-reaching and dangerous implications. AB 2427 will eliminate the ability for every single community in California to reflect and implement the will of their citizens in the form of local regulations, prohibitions, and ordinances. Today there are many thousands of such ordinances that enhance public safety, reduce pollution in sensitive areas, protect environmentally and ecologically challenged species, as well as limit leaf-blowing, construction hours of operation and practices, and restrict the location of certain businesses in areas that have been determined to be unsuitable by residents. The list goes on for days. This bill would invalidate thousands of these regulations that communities have implemented over the decades and centuries to reflect the values of its citizens. How can this be tolerated?

I asked a friend of mine in the City Government of Beverly Hills to share the city’s municipal ordinances with my staff. Upon cursory examination we uncovered dozens of local ordinances, regulations, and prohibitions that would be instantly invalidated once AB 2427 took effect. In 2006, the city of Los Angeles implemented a sweeping local ordinance mandating dogs be spayed and neutered in the name of public safety. This ordinance absolutely has the effect of restricting a Veterinarian’s options, and as such could be overturned by AB 2427. In 2003 the City of West Hollywood, with overwhelming support from the community enacted a Declaw ban for cats. They spent the next five years fighting the California Veterinary Medical Association (the sponsor of AB 2427) who sought to overturn the ban as an infringement against the right of their Veterinarian members to freely practice their trade. The City prevailed in court and under appeal, even to the California Supreme Court. This caught my interest and prompted me to take a closer look.

It seems as though the CVMA has a cozy relationship with the bill’s sponsor and apparently donated a large sum of money to Assemblyman Mike Eng’s political fund just a few weeks prior to the bills introduction. The CVMA lost fair and square in court, but decided they would continue their fight to have the ban overturned by sponsoring a nutty bill through the back door. If AB 2427 is passed it not only has the potential to subvert the will of the people of West Hollywood, it can in an instant invalidate hundreds of years of local community initiatives that truly reflect the will of millions of people.

I urge you to take a moment out of your day and learn more about this quickly moving train wreck that has the ability to wreak havoc across our state. The real impact of this misguided legislation will be chaos as local communities will be forced to eliminate ANY local regulations, prohibitions, or ordinances regulating ANY OF THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES of Accountants, Architects, Auto repairpersons, Cemetery operators, Contractors, Dentists, Doctors, Electrical/Appliance repairpersons, Optometrists, Pharmacists, Psychologists, Security personnel, and Veterinarians. That’s scary!

Dave Weisman
Executive Director

About The Dax Foundation

The Dax Foundation is a private, California-based non-profit, philanthropic organization that implements and supports innovative programs that help people around the world identify, pursue, and realize their dreams. The Foundation provides resources, support, and raises awareness for those individuals and groups whose vision includes making the world a better place for all people and animals. Sample projects currently supported by the Foundation include the Mayfair Foundation, a recreation and educational facility for severely disabled children, Over A Barrel, a rescue and treatment facility for abused and neglected animals, Organs R' Us, a program dedicated to raising awareness about the critical need for life-saving organ donation, Maui Cat, a humane program to reduce the pain and suffering of rampant feral cat populations, and other deserving programs around the world. For more information on the Dax Foundation, please visit www.daxfoundation.org. (new people own the site and run a different non-profit there)

Please note that most of the sources and data used to support the statements made herein related to the deleterious medical and behavioral effects of declawing have proven to be unreliable. The Dax Foundation is completing a thorough review of all available data and the status of declawing restrictions, if any around the world. Once the data has been compiled the program materials will be updated."

Below is Ed Boks, Edward Boks, Edward Albert Boks speaking at the same meeting. He also gets grilled by the Councilmembers. Ed Boks states he left LA Animal Services after "fulfilling his duties." He was actually fired.


I found documents which show Ed Boks completely contradicts himself on declaw.

I've saved some of Boks' old posts as pdf files and uploaded to my site as he is deleting them. Just last month he said declawing is inhumane.

September 25, 2009
Boks posts on facebook that it's time to stop declawing.
http://www.animaladvocates.us/bandeclaw/Ed_Boks_anti-declaw-1.pdf

He posts the same to his blog same day. He deleted both of these posts but I saved copies knowing he'd delete them
http://www.animaladvocates.us/bandeclaw/boksnodeclaw1.pdf
He basically states the position of the Paw Project. Declaw is inhumane, causes behavioral  problems which cause cats to be dumped at shelters.

August 13, 2009
Boks posts Dr. Jenny Conrad's no declaw billboard on his blog. Funny it's the photo I edited on my facebook page.
http://www.animaladvocates.us/bandeclaw/boksdeclawban3.pdf

July 11, 2008
Boks blogs as the GM that AB2427 is bad and declaw is inhumane. Blog is still up there, for now.
http://www.animaladvocates.us/bandeclaw/edboksdeclaw4.pdf

"AB 2427 (Eng), a bill sponsored by the California Veterinary Medical
Association (CVMA), will prevent local communities from deciding what
veterinary procedures they will allow in their communities. This could
affect future restrictions on declawing, tail docking, ear cropping and
similar inhumane procedures on animals."

January 2006
Boks gave me his GM position statements to post on the Dept website. See "cosmetic surgery."
"LAAS is against any unnecessary surgical procedure on animals when such a procedure is
performed solely for the convenience or pleasure of the animals owner.  This includes
declawing cats, cropping ears, and docking tails."
http://www.animaladvocates.us/bandeclaw/bokspositionstatement.pdf

I worked for Boks from January 2006 to December 2006 (July officially). With absolute certainty I can tell you he was ALWAYS against declaw. He said it was unnecessary and inhumane. He was against declaw until less than three weeks ago when he met Dave Weisman of the DAX Foundation. All of a sudden Boks does a 180 on the issue and now feels declawing is "humane and necessary." He states the alternative to declaw is death which is not true. The alternatives to declaw are nail caps, nail trims, cat training, human training and more. I believe Boks is lobbying against the declaw ban for compensation or promise of compensation of some sort. Nothing else would explain the quick 180 on the issue.

And FTR Boks has been in animal control since 1998 minus three years. He's been in animal control maybe ten years, not 30 as he states as of the date I uploaded the video).

About Dave Allen Weisman: Born October 11, 1962 in Los Angeles County, California, (taken from another source)

"Mr. Weisman brings more than 20 years of senior level management experience. Weisman most recently served as Chairman and CEO of Eagle Broadband. Before serving in that position, he was Vice President, Sales & Marketing at the security software firm, IP Dynamics. Prior to his work at IP Dynamics, Mr. Weisman co-founded and was Vice President, Sales & Marketing for Canyon Networks. He was also Vice President, Marketing and Customer Service for ACT Networks. Mr. Weisman also co-founded and served as Vice President, Sales & Marketing for Thomson Enterprise Networks in 1999. Prior to his work at Thomson, he held senior marketing positions at Adaptive Corporation (acquired in 1994) where he developed and launched the industry's first ATM network switch and networking company Retix (which had an initial public offering in 1992). Mr. Weisman also founded and was CEO of a consumer products distribution company, which he grew to $12 million in sales and subsequently sold in 1987. Mr. Weisman also served as a pilot with the United States Air Force Reserve and saw active combat duty in Central America and Operation Desert Storm. He holds a B.A. in Economics and International Relations from U.C.L.A."

Dave Weisman stated an anonymous person started the Dax Foundation and funded it with $75M. The organization was never formed or funded. The mysterious Mr Dax was actually Dave Weisman. He formed this fake wealthy organization to get women and get invited to events. He was reported to the IRS and Attorney General and shut down. Here is his old website. Notice Mr Dax looks exactly like him.
http://web.archive.org/web/20120311030535/http://daxfoundation.org/ His website even has a press release which states he was AGAINST declawing.

Dave Weisman has a criminal history. 
About Edward Albert Boks: Born August 15, 1951 in Wayne, Michigan. Edward Boks dropped out of college. He was a pastor at Grace Chapel in Phoenix, Arizona. He later became an ACO at Maricopa Animal Control. He eventually became the General Manager of the shelter. He was eventually fired after an audit revealed problems. He then became General Manager of New York Animal Control. He was eventually fired after an audit revealed problems. He then became the General Manager of Los Angeles Animal Services. He was eventually fired after being sued for racial discrimination and sexual harassment. He then became the General Manager of Yavapai Humane Society in Prescott, Arizona where he is today.

This is written by Mary Cummins, not The Paw Project.

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.



Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit
Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit